How does the Turnbow family's financial struggle shape their decisions and interactions with others?
Thrown into an environment
that is failing due to excess precipitation, the Turnbow family is left to act
within their own self-interest and cannot afford to think of the environment before
their financial hardships. On top of their monetary difficulties, no members of
the family are educated enough to understand the environmental effects that cutting
down the trees on their property would have. Dellarobia herself was initially
concerned only with the appearance of the property following the lumber job,
stating “They’ll make it look like a warzone,” naively ignoring the more
crucial costs to the environment and local habitats the logging would bring as
well (Kingsolver 40). Due to their social status and rural, poverty-ridden town,
it is easy to understand why the Turnbow’s take the environment into zero consideration
when deciding how to save their farm from being foreclosed.
Following
her time working and learning under Ovid Byron, Dellarobia reflects on the lack
of education she received while she was in school to which Ovid is outraged by.
She explains the split of social dynamics in the state of Tennessee, “cities on
one end of it, and farms on the other,” and the elusiveness of money sent to the
rural side of the state—the side she grew up in (224). This lack of funding and
the rural lifestyle of the residents of Feathertown makes college “kind of
irrelevant,” to them, which Ovid reacts to “as if she’d mentioned they boiled local
children alive” (224). With little priority on academics, Dellarobia explains
the impact athletics had on her town, with notable figures like the mayor and Pastor
Bobby Ogle gaining their notoriety originally from success in high school sports.
Without any focus on further education beyond high school, members of the Feathertown
community, such as the Turnbow’s, cannot be expected to be knowledgeable on climate
change nor the human actions attributable to it. The Turnbow’s financial difficulties
and rural lifestyle also make their efforts to reduce their environmental impact
limited.
While
observing the monarchs for their flight behavior, Dellarobia listens to climate
change activist, Leighton Atkins, read off different ways to reduce her carbon
emissions and promote sustainability. However, she finds the applicability of
the methods to herself and her family difficult due to their financial limitations,
stating that she can’t afford to eat out, she doesn’t purchase bottled water, she
can’t buy things off of Craigslist because she doesn't own a computer and so on
(327). Although he means well in his “Sutainability Pledge,” Leighton’s list
does not fit Dellarobia and her family’s way of living. The pledge is only applicable
to those who can afford to do things Dellarobia cannot. It makes it clear as to
why the Turnbow’s could care less about their environmental impact of the logging
and would focus more on their farm and its continuation by selling off the resources
they have now. They cannot risk losing their family’s only possession and main
source of income to act environmentally friendly while others will continue to
tarnish the environment no matter what they themselves choose to do.
I found your reading of the book in regards to this issue to be quite astute. I completely agree that the novel often highlights the dichotomy between the upper class and the lower class and how they consider the environment. The upper class often worry about the environment but in a self-serving manner, while the lower class are too concerned with their own survival to consider the long-term consequences of any actions. To add onto your argument, I would like to highlight a section towards the end of the novel. To decide on the fate of the land behind the house, the Turnbow family have a meeting with Pastor Bobby Ogle. The only one who is still for the logging is Bear. It's not until Bobby reassures him that his "financial concerns can be met" that he relents (403). As it says, "suddenly, Bear was defeated and Bobby was beaming" (404). It was only through having monetary security that the family preserved the land and avoided more ecological destruction, not through some sense of duty or moral responsibility. It goes to strengthen your argument that for those in the lower class, their own stability is more important.
ReplyDelete